Download Your Free Report Now!
Your email address will not be published.

GHS—Understanding the New Hazard Communication Standard

Chemical Management
by Kelly Lagana
"Yesterday we gave you the skinny on complying with Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) under OSHA’s Globally Harmonized System (GHS) amendments to the Hazard Communication Standard. But SDSs aren’t the only thing that changed. There are also new labeling requirements employers need to know about. "

Who Has to Be Trained?

See this guidance for understanding what you have to do for compliance with the hazard communication standard with GHS amendments.

The New GHS Label

Chemical manufacturers and importers have until June 1, 2015 to develop new GHS-compliant labels and put them on chemical containers. Chemical distributors have until December 1, 2015 to make sure the new labels are affixed to all containers that are shipped. However, some manufacturers and distributors are ahead of schedule and you may already have started to see the new GHS labels on your shipments of chemicals.

The new labels shipped with the container have to display all of the following elements:

  • A pictogram with one of eight new hazard symbols inside a diamond-shaped box with a red border
  • A signal word, either “Danger” or “Warning”
  • Hazard statements, such as “Highly flammable liquid and vapor.”
  • Precautionary statements, such as “Keep container tightly closed.”
  • The product identifier, such as product name and/or code.
  • Supplier identification, including manufacture name, address, and phone.

The label may also contain supplemental information, such as “Directions for use.”


Great news! BLR’s renowned Safety.BLR.com® website now has even more timesaving features. Take our no-cost site tour! Or better yet, try it at no cost or obligation for a full 2 weeks.


There’s time to train. Just like SDSs, employers have until December 1, 2013, to train workers on the new chemical labels. However, it would be prudent to start training your employees how to read and interpret the new labels as soon as they begin to appear on shipments to your workplace.

Some things haven’t changed. Many of the other requirements for labeling chemical containers, including language requirements, exemptions for labeling pipe systems, and alternative labeling systems have not significantly changed, except labeling alternatives must be consistent with GHS label system.

Labels in English

The labels or other forms of warning must be legible, in English, and prominently displayed on the container, or readily available in the work area throughout each work shift. Employers with employees who speak other languages may add the label information in their language, as long as the information is presented in English as well.

Hazardous chemical containers must include either:

  • The label shipped with the chemical container; or
  • A product identifier and combination of words, pictures, or symbols that provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and provide employees with the specific information about the physical and health hazards of the chemical.

Your one-stop safety management resource, available 24/7. Go here to take a no-cost site tour or here to try it in your o


Alternatives to Labeling

As an alternative to labeling all individual process containers, employers can:

  • Substitute various types of standard operating procedures, process sheets, batch tickets, blend tickets, and similar written materials for container labels on stationary process equipment if they contain the same information as the labels.
  • Post signs or placards that convey the hazard information if there are a number of stationary containers within a work area that have similar contents and hazards.
  • Use alternative labeling systems such as the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 704 Hazard Rating and the Hazardous Material Information System (HMIS) as long as those systems are consistent with the GHS labeling system.

All information supplied on the alternative labels must be consistent with the GHS label system; for example, there must be no conflicting hazard statement and pictogram.

Outdated Labels–Procedures to Correct

If an employer becomes aware of any significant new information about the hazards of a chemical, the employer must revise the labels for the chemical within 6 months of becoming aware of the new information. The employer must also ensure that labels on containers of hazardous chemicals contain the new information.

4 Comments

Share Your Comments on This Tip

If you have comments about this tip and want to post them on this page to share your thoughts with other Environmental Daily Advisor readers, simply enter your comments below. NOTE: Your name will appear on any comments posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. http://www.therosegoldstandard.com/        http://www.therosegoldstandard.com/
    June 17, 2016 5:26 am

    Thanks for the kind words, Keith, Reikro, NakedMonk, and Joseph! Yes, Gonzalo was very… inspiring! He oozed masculinity from every pore!Reikro– I’ll be all over that blog once it’s up, dude! And happy early birthday!And Joseph– Persuasions is definetely slated to make a comeback this year! It’ll be more sexy and scandalous than ever!

  2. http://www.sorethumbsblog.com/        http://www.sorethumbsblog.com/
    April 28, 2016 9:20 pm

    Idiotic articles like this one are part of why I left Korea, but the Koreans I speak to now cannot understand why it was unpleasant for me to be part of a group that was constantly attacked in the press (nor could many of my more complacent colleagues back in Seoul.) I am not going to be damaging the Korean economy anytime soon, but the constant trickle of nasty, discriminatory articles is surely having an effect on Korea's reputation (if it ever had one.)

  3. http://www.blrimages.net/        http://www.blrimages.net/
    April 28, 2016 9:15 pm

    Baught me some Solar 2, and lemme tell you, this game is cash. I’ve spent way too long making a galaxy death machine, rolling around blowing the piss outa everything. Worlds of fun.Only problem I’m having is I cant make a multi-star system. Im probably just doing something wrong, it is 5am after all!

  4. Nasima        http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003469725013
    February 27, 2016 7:27 am

    in the vid that Montesorri is trained not to flolow rules, self motivated questioning of what’s happening in the world, etc…Google founders derived their PageRank search algorithm from similar previous work such as the search algorithm by for IBM. In that case, the PageRank was not original. The Google founders simply flolowed other previous similar work (to improve speed, accuracy, etc,…). Had IBM and Prof. John Kleinberg himself were serious about Kleinberg’s HITS algorithm in bringing it to commercial success, then we wouldn’t be talking GOOGLE today. We would perhaps be talking something like KleinHits as a dominant search engine.But anyway, give credits to Google founders for bringing their idea to the business world.There is no doubt that Montesorri had influenced the education of Google founders, but their work was based on previous similar researches with people who didn’t go to Montesorri.PS : I’m not anti-Montensorri. I think that Montensorri has advantages over traditional methods of teaching in our education system. However I won’t jump in and say that if everyone goes to Montesorri, they will become Sergey Brin and Larry Page on day.